Thursday, November 1, 2018

CARAVANS BRINGING DISEASE: THREATEN HEALTHCARE OVERWHELM & METASTASIZING DEFICITS

“‘Alex Mensing, a U.S.-based organizer with the group Pueblo Sin Fronteras, which is providing humanitarian assistance to the migrants, said the size of the caravan has swelled to 10,000 people.’ [USA Today 10/25/18]

“In fact, it is families and children who benefit the most from those loopholes, as the White House has suggested. As a result, it notes:

“We have seen a record-shattering surge in the arrival of family units, with more than 161,000 family unit apprehensions and inadmissibles in fiscal year (FY) 2018.

“This historic surge was 42 percent higher than any previous year on record.

“In the last three months, family unit apprehensions made up the highest percentage of total apprehensions in history.

“Tens of thousands of unaccompanied minors continue to stream across our borders.

“Unaccompanied minor apprehensions and inadmissibles totaled 58,660 in FY 2018, an increase of nearly 10,000, or approximately 20 percent, compared to FY 2017."

A. Arthur, via CIS, 10/26/18

But the foregoing just relates to family Units … the latest reports are that Fully 70% of the Caravan are young males (Fox News 10/31/18).

DISEASE

“The Immigration and Nationality Act mandates that all immigrants and refugees undergo a medical screening examination to determine whether they have an inadmissible health condition. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has technical instructions for medical examination of prospective immigrants in their home countries before they are permitted to enter the U.S. …
“But what about people who enter our country illegally? The CDC specifically cites the possibility of the cross-border movement of HIV, measles, pertussis, rubella, rabies, hepatitis A, influenza, tuberculosis, shigellosis and syphilis. Chris Cabrera, a Border Patrol agent in South Texas, warned: ‘What’s coming over into the U.S. could harm everyone. We are starting to see scabies, chickenpox, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections and different viruses.’ Some of the youngsters illegally entering our country are known to be carrying  … infectious diseases that might endanger American children when these immigrants enter schools across our nation.[Emphasis Added. Ed.]
“According to the CDC, … the number of cases of tuberculosis and the number of deaths caused by TB steadily declined during the 100 years prior to the mid-1980s. Since the ’80s, immigrants have reversed this downward trend …. The number of active TB cases among American-born citizens declined from an estimated 17,725 in 1986 to 3,201 in 2015. That was an 80 percent drop. Data reported to the National Tuberculosis Surveillance System show that the TB incidence among foreign-born people in the United States (15.1 cases per 100,000) is approximately 13 times the incidence among U.S.-born people (1.2 cases per 100,000). Those statistics refer to immigrants who are legally in the U.S. There is no way for us to know the incidence of tuberculosis and other diseases carried by those who are in our country illegally and hence not subject to medical examination. …[Emphasis Added. Ed.]
“This public health issue is ignored by all those Americans championing sanctuary cities. The public health issue is also ignored by Americans clamoring for open borders … in the late 19th century and early 20th century, when masses of European immigrants were trying to enter our country, those with dangerous diseases were turned back from Ellis Island. Americans hadn’t “progressed” to the point of thinking that anyone in the world has a legal right to live in America. Neither did they think that it was cruel or racist to take measures to prevent our fellow Americans from catching diseases from foreigners.
“But aside from diseases, there is the greater threat of welcoming to our shores people who have utter contempt for Western values and want to import anti-Western values to our country, such as genital mutilation, honor killings and the oppression of women. …

“The bottom line is that we Americans have a right to decide who enters our country and under what conditions. If we forgo that right, we cease to be a sovereign nation. But that may not be important to some Americans.”

“Immigrants and Disease,” Walter E. Williams, 08/29/2018 via lewrockwell.com

Walter E. Williams is the John M. Olin distinguished professor of economics at George Mason University, and a nationally syndicated columnist. To find out more about Walter E. Williams and read features by other Creators Syndicate columnists and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate © 2018 Creators.com.

Those who are campaigning for insurance protection for pre-existing health conditions are also enthusiastic about more and more immigration. 

What do they think will happen to Healthcare when the border is over-run with successive caravans of people who may (and often do) carry infectious diseases?

COSTS 

And the costs for each thousand members of the caravan who succeed in entering and remaining in the USA would be about $20 Million per thousand per year.   That is about $200 Million for each cohort of 10,000. [federalsafetynet.com/poverty-and-spending-over-the-years]. See also, CarryingCapacity.org, NET Costs of Legal Immigration per year ($330 Billion).

DEMOGRAPHICS

As an example of how immigration affects Demographic Dynamics, the following are the figures for  Public school enrollment in California in 2016 which was over two thirds non-White with a Majority of those students coming from Immigrant backgrounds.

California
Percent
African American/Black
5.8%
American Indian/Alaska Native
0.6%
Asian/Asian American
8.9%
Filipino
2.5%
Hispanic/Latino
54.0%
Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander
0.5%
White
24.1%
Multiracial
3.1%

Public School Enrollment by Race/Ethnicity, California, 2016, via kidsdata.org

BALANCE’s SOLUTION: The U.S.A. needs a zero–net (i.e., 150,000 per year arrivals and 150,000 per year leaving) Moratorium applying to all immigrant categories, a Wall at our Southern Border, mandating use of e-Verify in Hiring Decisions, elimination of anchor baby citizenship and an end to Catch & Release. 

Enactment of all these would reduce the 1.6 Million Annual flow of Legal Immigrants (400,000 annually into California alone – U.S. Census) and thus greatly reduce the Annual NET (after subtracting Taxes Immigrants pay) Costs of Legal Immigration, now running at $330 BILLION per year.

Implementing the Trump Administration’s Admirable Proposal that No Green Cards (reflecting permanent Resident Status) would be issued to those who had accepted, or were likely to accept in the future, any Taxpayer-funded Benefits, would reduce Immigrant Numbers significantly.

IMMIGRATION LEGISLATION IS BEING CONSIDERED NOW! And December 7 is the Deadline to pass a Budget and fund The Wall. 

It is highly likely that a Bill fully funding The Wall will contain other Immigration Provisions! So, we must ACT NOW! Emphasize that a Zero-Net Moratorium would save Taxpayers $One-Half Trillion in the next Decade. So CONTACT & RECONTACT Your Representatives!

And please help BALANCE MOBILIZE ACTIVISTS and contact Media and Congress to intensity our push for the aforementioned all-categories included zero-NET MORATORIUM TODAY, NOW! Contact your representatives!

TO MAXIMIZE BALANCE's CLOUT PLEASE DONATE NOW!

Dollar for Dollar, Donations to BALANCE and its ASAP! Coalition Allies who push a Moratorium, create much more Political Clout for reduction in immigration numbers than Donations to Mass Immigration Management Groups, i.e., those who refuse to push for an all-categories-included Zero-Net Moratorium.

Indeed, such Refusal is counterproductive to genuine Immigration Reduction Efforts because the Main Management Groups advocate positions which ensure unending Mass Immigration.

BALANCE very much needs your Tax-Deductible Donation TODAY.

So Please DONATE NOW by credit card at our website: BALANCE.ORG or, to donate by check via U.S mail, please send to:

Population-Environment Balance | P.O. Box 268 | San Francisco, CA 94104

And support our Crowd-Funding effort at Mass Immigration Hurts Environment.

The Next Few Days are Critical!

Thank you,


"When the population of a species grows beyond the capacity of its environment to sustain it, it reduces that capacity below the original level, ensuring an eventual population crash.

"Extinction is the most serious, utterly irreversible effect of unsustainable human population."

Follow BALANCE on Twitter @PEnvirons and GAB @PopEnvironmentBalance

Mailing address:

Population-Environment Balance | P.O. Box 268 | San Francisco, CA 94104

Washington, DC address:

Population-Environment Balance | 1629 K Street NW, Suite 300 | Washington DC, 20006

BALANCE is anti-Mass-Immigration, not anti-immigrant.

BALANCE is the leading National Organization publicizing information regarding the
Threat of Mass Immigration-generated population growth to our Environment, Nation, Budgets, and Personal Safety and Mobilizing Activists to Reduce it.


Tuesday, October 30, 2018

DEFEATING CULTURAL MARXISM IN POLITICS, ECONOMICS, CULTURE & IMMIGRATION POLICY


carryingcapacity.org

November, 2018



Many destructive phenomena in today's political, economic and cultural environment in the US and Western Europe are caused by, or have their roots in, “Cultural Marxism”.

Among the many are Mass Immigration, Political Correctness, Identity Politics, Aggression against Political Opponents, and yes, ANTIFA. The goal of Cultural Marxism is world domination through undermining the values expressed by principal institutions — such as family, religion, traditional sexual roles, and shared heritage and history — of the   peoples it seeks to control.  So it is critically important to understand Cultural Marxism. 

Practices which weaken or destroy fundamental cultural values impair the sustainability of a nation—as the eminent Garrett Hardin asserted in his classic 1986 essay ‘Cultural Carrying Capacity’—just as overuse of not-easily replaceable resources is a violation of long-term ecological carrying capacity. Among values essential to the sustainability of the United States are, for example, Freedom of Speech, Rule of Law, and Respect for a shared Heritage and English Language—all basic to social cohesion, national unity and national preservation. 

But increasingly in the second half of the twentieth century, and more so into the 21st, the social movement known as Cultural Marxism began to destructively transform the USA and the European-derived Nations themselves.

Cultural Marxism works through Indoctrination, at times almost subliminal, so that it remains unrecognized by the indoctrinated.  Did the leaders of the People for the Ethical Treatment of animals know that their recent statement that “Drinking milk is Racist and a symbol of White Supremacy” is a reflection of the Culturally Marxist Agenda?

Indeed, Carrying Capacity Network was right to warn Americans in its February, 2010 posting of Military Historian William Lind’s superb article  (this article is available at CarryingCapacity.org, as the February 2010 post in the Alerts section) about the threat of Cultural Marxism. Unfortunately, the threat is increasingly being realized in a multitude of ways and is not random but purposeful. 

Leading self-identified Cultural Marxists have stated that the destruction of western civilization, western nations, and Christianity are among their goals. But not real destruction; simply a transfer of the property, wealth, and power of the founding stock of western nations to the Cultural Marxists—a blatantly economic and political goal.

Simple observation shows the extent to which Cultural Marxism's push for politically correct speech, multiculturalism, multilingualism, mass immigration, enhanced rights for certain categories of citizens, and ‘globalism’ (as opposed to internationalism) threaten western culture and the sovereignty of western nations. A case in point is the blurring of gender categories including the feminization of young American men.

Feminization can be seen most recently in a Brown University course offering.  “Masculinity 101” is  a course on “unlearning toxic masculinity”, where  “those socialized as men” are helped “to unlearn” their supposedly “naturally violent” tendencies. 

The increasing success of Cultural Marxism springs in large part from patiently and insidiously infiltrating and indoctrinating with the aim of operationalizing, Lenin’s injunction: “The best way to control the opposition is to lead it ourselves.”  Brown's revolutionary course offering was not sprung on a resisting student body but follows decades of persuading men and women that women prefer men who are “sensitive”.  

The asserted female preference for “sensitive” men is the result of brainwashing aimed at conditioning generations of women to think of themselves as victims. For anyone, particularly a man, to say otherwise would be politically incorrect.  The Self-censorship of speech encouraged by the Cultural Marxists is common and extends even to limitation of free thought. 

Americans at most educational levels have been conditioned not to utter, or even think, politically Incorrect thoughts for fear of being ostracized by their similarly conditioned peer groups. And Cultural Marxists, via their dominance in the Mainstream Media, define what is deemed politically incorrect

For example, distortion of scientific observation and jettisoning of the null hypothesis, the traditional guardian of objectivity, are manifested in mandatory belief in anthropogenic global warming. “Denialist” has taken its place beside the more common “racist” and “anti-Semite” labels that ostracize the non-conformist.  Denialists take on the aura of evil.

One of the Cultural Marxists’ most effective techniques is splitting Western Nations into competing, minority, social, cultural and interest groups. Playing these groups off against one another results in more Power for the Globalist Cultural Marxists. Continuing Mass Immigration and Identity Politics are effective Cultural Marxist Techniques for executing this Strategy.

Generally, these Marxists promote [and try to guide] any cause which is anti-nationalist and pro-globalist, e.g., through Trade Deals like NAFTA and TPP. Unwitting, though sincere, environmentalists have also been exploited in this way in recent years, being encouraged to push for Globalist solutions

to environmental problems, a nearly impossible task, since the world's population increases by about 80 million per year, and those 80 million plus the 7.7 Billion already living, commandeer what resources they can to survive.

Regarding Cultural Marxist tactics, consider for example, the impact of the de facto Activist Handbook for the Cultural Marxists, Saul Alinsky’s Rules for Radicals via the following observations from Rense.com:

“Alinsky scolded the Sixties Left for scaring off potential converts in Middle America. True revolutionaries do not flaunt their radicalism, Alinsky taught. They cut their hair, put on suits and infiltrate the system from within.

“Alinsky viewed revolution as a slow, patient process. The trick was to penetrate existing institutions such as churches, unions and political parties.

“Alinsky’s crowning achievement was his recruitment of a young high school student named Hillary Rodham. She met Alinsky through a radical church group. Hillary wrote an analysis of Alinsky’s methods for her senior thesis at Wellesley College. They remained friends until Alinsky’s death in 1972.

“Many leftists view Hillary as a sell-out because she claims to hold moderate views on some issues. However, Hillary is simply following Alinsky’s counsel to do and say whatever it takes to gain power.

“Barack Obama is also an Alinskyite. Trained by Alinsky’s Industrial Areas Foundation, Obama spent years teaching workshops on the Alinsky method. In 1985 he began a four-year stint as a community organizer in Chicago, working for an Alinskyite group called the Developing Communities Project. Later, he worked with ACORN and its offshoot Project Vote, both creations of the Alinsky network.

“Camouflage is key to Alinsky-style organizing.”

“Hillary, Obama, and The Cult of Alinsky,” R. Poe, Rense.com, 2008.

Indeed, Alinsky’s Counsel is not merely to “Say and Do whatever it takes to gain power,” but also to “Tell any Lie and Repeat it often enough until it is believed.”

The following excerpts are a shrewd observer's analysis of Cultural Marxism. It demonstrates how well-intentioned Policies or Movements can be used or transformed to achieve the Cultural Marxists’ goals:

“‘Cultural Marxism’ ... employs Political Correctness, a concoction of many intimidating tools such as Affirmative Action (punishing achievers/discrediting merit/rewarding under-achievers); Feminism (emasculating the masses and especially White Males); Multiculturalism/Diversity Worship …; Social Justice (reducing all to the lowest common denominator using forced redistribution of wealth); Racism/Bigotry Accusations (setting some … free from consequences & inducing guilt in others to the point that rape, mayhem, robbery, even murder … are ignored or deemphasized, while the death of a … criminal is treated as a national sin); Entitlement Mentality (have-nots are victims of the haves); Open Borders (facilitating foreign invasions of hostile, non-acculturated horde…)Throw in ... [Various Rights] movements. Results=the death of common sense, logic, excellence, civility, rule of law, justice, i.e., the Death of Western culture, language, national sovereignty.

“The Death of the West’s individualism could not be achieved with bullets (via Bolshevik Revolutions—Ed.) so the clever Collectivist ... Cultural Marxists devised a system of psychological warfare which was implemented (via ‘The Frankfurt School’) by their ‘march through the institutions’ … i.e., infiltration into the influential societal institutions such as education & politics ... via ... U.S. media & most entertainment, molding thought, language, social mores & values. Their principal tools are Political Correctness (see above) & Critical Theory (including ‘Deconstructionism’ in Political Science, Philosophy, Literature and other Academic Departments and Groups—ed.) soundly criticizing all Western values, e.g., the male as head of household (‘oppressive authoritarian’), achievement as something unfair to ‘others’, rugged individualism is vilified since everyone can’t honestly gain the same level of comforts as the achievers, [one] skin color automatically branded as racist or privileged & [another] skin color painted as victims who deserve … largesse.

“Diversity (as opposed to assimilation -Ed) is touted as a supreme virtue, especially by the education cabal. 

“Long term thinking about logical consequences of such societal behavior is smugly ignored while history is revised to suit a collective ideology, as well as standards & expectations. A cursory look at the history of Collectivism (Communism, Socialism, Monarchy, Dictatorship, the new term Progressivism, etc.) reveals an endless array of dead bodies, ruined lives, and destruction of industries, homes, farms, towns, cities, by the untold millions and, as always, it’s the smallest minority in the world affected…the individual.

“Most of the world’s destruction has been by the use of sword & bullets, now we face an even more deadly enemy—the psychological warfare tactic that renders its victims mentally defenseless & accepting of a horrific sense of guilt based…on their skin color—... When a people can be disarmed & made instrumental in their own demise without combat, that people is surely doomed.

“On a local front, every town has a certain number of opportunists who latch on to the Collectivist programs—HUD, NGO’s, MPO’s, numerous welfare programs (homeless, food, medical, etc.), understanding there is big money to be had from Government Grants & Funding,  ...”

B McCutchen, arkansasfreedom.com, August, 2016

And CCN adds: 

... One of the Cultural Marxists’ major power and resource acquisition techniques may appropriately be characterized as Guilt Inculcation. This is manifested in the increasingly widespread use of the Terms “White Privilege”, “White Racism, and “White Guilt.”

For example, The City of Seattle is now offering a course in “White Fragility” aimed at “improving Caucasians’ low emotional tolerance for discussing Racism” and to help whites “tolerate racial stress”....All for only $60! and taught by a Ph.D yet! Similarly, SUNY Binghampton offers a course entitled, “Stop White People.” claiming that participants will acquire “the tools to do so” when encountering adverse arguments.

Another institutional target of the Cultural Marxists is the traditional family and traditional gender roles, all for the same purpose of fragmenting any potential opposition to the Goals of the Cultural Marxists. Indeed, one can argue that Globalist and Regionalist Institutions like the IMF/EU and complicit Central Banks like the private for-profit Federal Reserve are, wittingly or unwittingly, Allies of the Cultural Marxists.

Finally, and Importantly, Cultural Marxism tolerates no Counter-Arguments because a counter-argument might “Trigger” PTSD in the Listener or invade a Listener’s “Safe Space.”  Thus, it labels nearly all opposing arguments as “Hate Speech.”

Unfortunately, the Cultural Marxists continue to gain power in the Media, Culture, Politics and Western Nations, in general.

A. Mueller, writing for the Mises Institute describes Cultural Marxism’s recent successes. 

But fortunately Carrying Capacity Network and James Kirkpatrick provide excellent suggestions for successfully combating it (see below).

Is Cultural Marxism America's New Mainline Ideology?

October 1, 2018 - 12:15 PM Antony P. Mueller, Mises Institute

“Another name for the neo-Marxism of increasing popularity in the United States is cultural Marxism. This theory says that the driving force behind the socialist revolution is not the proletariat — but the intellectuals. While Marxism has largely disappeared from the workers' movement, Marxist theory flourishes today in cultural institutions, in the academic world, and in the mass media. This “cultural Marxism” goes back to Antonio Gramsci (1891-1937) and the Frankfurt School. The theorists of Marxism recognized that the proletariat would not play the expected historical role as a ‘revolutionary subject.’ Therefore, for the revolution to happen, the movement must depend on the cultural leaders to destroy the existing, mainly Christian, culture and morality and then drive the disoriented masses to Communism as their new creed. The goal of this movement is to establish a world government in which the Marxist intellectuals have the final say. In this sense, the cultural Marxists are the continuation of what started with the Russian revolution.

Lenin and the Soviets

“Led by Lenin, the perpetrators of the revolution regarded their victory in Russia only as the first step to the world revolution. The Russian Revolution [6] was neither Russian nor proletarian. In 1917, the industrial workers in Russia represented only a small part of the workforce, which mainly consisted of peasantry. The Russian Revolution was not the result of a labor movement but of a group of professional revolutionaries….

“The experience of World War I and its aftermath showed that the Marxist concept of the ‘proletariat’ as a revolutionary force was an illusion. At the example of the Soviet Union, one could also see that socialism could not function without a dictatorship. These considerations brought the leading Marxist thinkers to the conclusion that a different strategy would be required to establish socialism. Communist authors spread the insight that the socialist dictatorship must come in disguise. Before socialism can succeed, the existing culture must change. Control of the culture must precede political control.

Cultural Control Rises in Tandem with Political Control

“Helping the neo-Marxists was the fact many of their efforts in taking control of culture happened parallel to the encroachment of the state on individual liberties. Over the past decades, at the same time when so-called political correctness has been on the rise, the American government obtained a vast arsenal of repressive instruments....

Moral Corruption

“The way toward the rule of the cultural Marxists is the moral corruption of the people. To accomplish this, the mass media and public education must not enlighten but confuse and mislead. The media and the educational establishment work to put one part of the society against the other part. While group identities get more specific, the catalog of victimization and history of oppression becomes more detailed. To turn into a recognized victim of suppression is the way to gain social status and to obtain the right to special assistance, of respect and social inclusion.

“The demand for social justice creates an endless stream of expenditures deemed essential — for health, education, old age, and for all those people who are “needy,” “persecuted” and “oppressed,” be it real or imaginary. The flood of never-ending spending in these areas corrupts the state finances and produces fiscal crises. This helps the Neo-Marxists accuse “capitalism” of all evils when, in fact, it is the regulatory state that provokes the systemic failures and when it is the excess of public debt that causes the financial fragility.

“Politics, the media, and the judiciary never pause at waging the new endless wars: ... The list of the enemies grows every day whether racism, xenophobia, and anti-Islamism. The epitome of this movement is political correctness, the war against having one's own opinion. While the public tolerates disgusting expositions of behavior, particularly under the cult of the arts, the list of prohibited words and opinions grows daily. Public opinion must not go beyond the few accepted positions. Yet while the public debate impoverishes, the diversity of radical opinion flourishes in the hidden.

“... The aim is … the “dictatorship of political correctness” whose supreme authority lies in the hands of the cultural Marxists. As a new class of priests, the guardians of the new orthodoxy rule the institutions whose power they try to extend over all parts of the society. The moral destruction of the individual is a necessary step to accomplish the final victory.

Opium of the Intellectuals

“The believers of neo-Marxism are mainly intellectuals ... up to the writers and artists (and controlled Media -Ed) to conceal the brutality of the socialist regimes through articles and books and by films, music, and paintings, and to give socialism a scientific-intellectual, aesthetic and moral appearance. In the socialist propaganda, the new system appears to be both fair and productive.

“The cultural Marxists believe that someday they will be the sole holders of power and be able to dictate to the masses how to live and what to think….

Conclusion

“Contrary to what Marx believed, history is not pre-determined. The march through the institutions has gone far ..., the ideology of cultural Marxism is the main source of the profound confusion that has grabbed almost every segment of the modern Western societies and which is about to swell into even more dangerous proportions.”

... but it is not too late to successfully counter it ...

J. Kirkpatrick, writing at vDare.com recommends three tactics to defeat the Cultural Marxists

“Because the Left’s coalition really is vulnerable, there are three key rules patriots (or anyone else under Cultural Marxist attack) should follow.

These include:

·         Expose the bad faith of attackers

These CultMarx lynchings are now so common that only those deep into the SJW cult can take them solely at face value. Just as Brett Kavanaugh did, the accused should always point out that these charges are being raised for political purposes, not moral reasons. Simply dismissing attacks as “Political Correctness” works, as President Trump’s dismissal of Megyn Kelly in the first Republican debate showed.

·         Frame your actions as equivalent to those Leftists already support

If a push for Voter ID laws draws accusations of racism, simply bring up what Mexico already does. If a border wall is “racist” or “unworkable,” point out America is already funding the border walls of other countries. No one, including progressives themselves, favors Leftist policies for the peoples or communities they actually care about. This isn’t the silly “Democrats Are The Real Racists“ Conservatism Inc. cliché—it’s simply an illustration that everyone is a nationalist for someone.

·         Never Disavow Without Demanding A Disavowal From The Other Side

A final point: always seek to exploit the natural cleavages in the Leftist coalition.

Since the rise of Trump, patriots have become more inured to Leftist rhetorical attacks. But Leftist control of the media, Internet platforms and fundraising capabilities means they can still impose fearsome economic costs.

Nevertheless, morally and socially, the costs seem less terrifying than they used to. Many Republicans simply don’t believe anything the MSM says anymore and so even the most outrageous charges are dismissed. Therefore, any patriot under attack should not disavow anyone, no matter how extreme, without demanding a countervailing disavowal from progressives.

Don’t disavow “white nationalists” without demanding that Democrats disavow antifa. If there is to be an investigation into Russian hacking, there should be an investigation into Chinese spying enabled by Dianne Feinstein. No patriot should ever make a concession without a concession from the opposite side.

Remember, while patriots will shrug off a disavowal as “doing what you have to do,” But Leftists will be enraged and start attacking each other and making wild charges.

“Even the most milquetoast Republicans must understand after the Kavanaugh Konfrontation that politics is war by other means. There is no longer any “common ground” that patriots share with the journalists and Cultural Marxists, who openly declaring their intention to destroy them.

“But by following these three rules, patriots will finally be able to get back on the attack—and stop losing their country in slow motion.”

James Kirkpatrick at vDare.com 

And arguably the Most Important Strategic Tactic for defeating the Cultural Marxists is pushed by CCN and its Allies:

PUSH A ZERO-NET ALL CATEGORIES INCLUDED MORATORIUM ON LEGAL IMMIGRATION

Mass Immigration provides the Cultural Marxists with the “Shock Troops” to push Key CULTURAL MARXISM Strategies to wit:

·         Destroying National Cohesion

·         Divide the Citizenry and Conquer

·         Cause Chaos in Society

·         Attack the Traditional sources of National Cohesion including the family, religion and Culture

·         Empower grievance groups to help achieve the foregoing

·         Intimidate the Opposition/s with Threats and outright Violence (think ANTIFA)



So far, the CULTURAL MARXISMs are winning, but with your help CCN can help turn the tide....



And if you can, please help us, (Carrying Capacity Network) intensify our Activist Mobilization, Media, lobbying and public education efforts by helping to mobilize our many thousands of volunteer activists with a one-time tax-deductible donation. Any donation, no matter how small will be greatly appreciated. And remember that CCN is a Genuine Mass Immigration Reduction Group, so Donations to CCN have far more impact dollar for dollar than Donations to Mass Immigration Management Groups who refuse to support a Zero-Net Moratorium.

Indeed, leading Management groups Strategies and Tactics are COUNTER-PRODUCTIVE.   Consider those of one group whose strategies are copied by several others.

1)  This group supports a reduction in Legal immigration to 500,000 and “eventually” to 300,000, which would even if achieved NOT result in sustainability — Immigrant fertility rates have historically been well in excess of replacement level. and that the world's population increases by 80 Million per year the pressure to emigrate to the USA will only intensify, especially if encouraged by the USA's current pro-Mass Immigration policies. In sum enactment of this groups position would result in unending U.S. population growth.

2)  And in any event pushing that position is COUNTERPRODUCTIVE  because in any Negotiation one should never start with the position where one wants to end up ,and

3) And perhaps MOST IMPORTANT.... COUNTERPRODUCTIVE because it explicitly sanctions unending Mass Immigration, and indeed legitimizes it!!  Thus this and similar groups are Mass Immigration MANAGEMENT Groups NOT genuine Reduction groups

4) And COUNTERPRODUCTIVE too because there is no rational for just those numbers....why not 600,000 or 400,000

5) And COUNTERPRODUCTIVE too because it fails to send the important message that in order to attain Sustainability, we must STOP U. S.  population growth..... and the only way to effectively push for that is to push for a zero-Net (150,000 immigrants and emigrants per year) MORATORIUM

6)  Finally consider whether the Management group/s positions reflect an attempt to be Politically Correct, and if, in so doing they have become Culturally Marxist Compliant?!

Therefore, CCN invites once again all genuine reductionist organizations to Join our Diversity Coalition for an Immigration MORATORIUM ... a Coalition supported by many Immigrants from all Ethnic Groups.

To help CCN distribute and publicize CCN's NET Costs of Legal Immigration Study and combat Cultural Marxism, please donate by Credit Card at Carrying Capacity Network, Inc. or by Check via U.S. mail to:

CCN’s Mailing Address
CCN
P.O.BOX 457
San Francisco, CA 94104  

Sincerely,

Carrying Capacity Network
CarryingCapacity.org
CarryingCapacityNetwork.blogspot.com

Comment & Follow CCN here:

Follow CARRYING CAPACITY on Twitter: @CCNetworkOrg and on GAB: @CarryingCapacity

and on Blogger: Carrying Capacity Network

Tuesday, October 2, 2018

IMMIGRATION REDUCTION PROGRESS via CCN! – HELP CCN Magnify It!


CCN’s NET Cost of Legal Immigration Study has facilitated Progress toward achieving reductions in Legal Immigration. This positive trend follows CCN's widely distributed “NET Costs of Legal Immigration” Study, which reached the White House, Members of Congress, and the Media.



The Key Point of the Study is that the large Numbers of LEGAL Immigrants entering the USA annually — about 1.5 to 1.6 Million — generate Huge NET (i.e., after subtracting Taxes Immigrants Pay) Costs to U.S. Taxpayers, i.e., $330 Billion per Year. Importantly, that “over $300 BILLION” Number was noted by Administration sources soon after they received CCN’s Study.



Remarkably, The Administration’s Team on immigration, has now focused on the costs of LEGAL Immigrant Numbers/Costs linkage, as explicitly made by CCN.  The White House has made the very sensible proposal to deny Green Cards (i.e., permanent resident status) to any immigrant who used taxpayer funded programs, e.g., Health care, Welfare, etc. or is likely to use them in the future! This brilliantly highlights a Key Question: Why should the American Taxpayer fund Legal Immigrants if the cost amounts to about $1000 per year for every existing US Citizen?



Indeed, about two thirds of all legal immigrants have used or prospectively will use federally (taxpayer)-funded Programs, many in violation of the conditions they swore to follow on their applications for visas.



So Carrying Capacity urges you to join us to continue to intensify our pressure by pushing your Representatives for BOTH



1) an all-categories-included Zero-Net Moratorium (which would reduce the USA’s Budget Deficit by over a Half Trillion Dollars in the next decade, if enacted now) AND for



2) Denial of Green Cards to any Immigrant who has or is likely to receive taxpayer funded benefits ...Also push for building The Wall and enacting e-Verify, etc. to keep up the pressure against illegal aliens entry.



Consider The Open Borders lobbies Interpretation as reflected in the Mainstream (i.e., Open Borders) Media:



“… Politico reported yesterday that one policy proposal aimed at both groups—making it more difficult for immigrants to get green cards by penalizing those who have previously used any form of public benefits, including insurance subsidies and tax credits—is already discouraging immigrants from applying for programs they need before it’s even on the books….” [Emphasis added, Ed.] 

"Stephen Miller's Latest Immigration Scheme Is Already Hurting Immigrants and Their Children”, Libby Watson9/04/18, Splinter News




The Administration’s response to critics:



“‘There is no constitutional right for a citizen in a foreign country who has no status in America to demand entry into our country. Such a right cannot exist. Such a right will never exist…. This is an ideological disagreement between those who believe we should have borders and should have controls and those who believe there should be no borders and no controls.’ [Stephen Miller, in an interview with ABC News].”



By Nahal Toosi, 08/29/2018, via Politico.com



Thus, CCN's NET Costs of Legal Immigration Study, via the Trump Administration, is beginning to have considerable impact as the following sympathetic reviews indicate:



“There's been a spate of articles in recent days complaining that the Trump Administration is moving to prevent welfare recipients from obtaining green cards. We are in one of those Narrative Shift moments.



“It seems just yesterday that the Left was arguing that immigrants don't use welfare [Immigrants Don't Drain Welfare. They Fund It. by Laura Reston, The New Republic, September 3, 2015]



“Now, we are being told they do use welfare. In fact, they desperately need it, and you are a monster if you think there's a problem with this. [Emphasis added, Ed.] 



“A typical passage from Slate:



‘Immigrant advocates immediately raised concern that even mentioning the proposed new rule could push low-income immigrants to avoid requesting public benefits out of fear that it could jeopardize their chances of receiving a green card in the future. Although the move shouldn’t affect those who already have green cards, advocates are also concerned they will stop using public benefits to be on the safe side. And those who would most likely be affected would be children of immigrants who are in the United States legally….’



[White House Wants to Deny Green Cards to Immigrants Who Receive Public Benefits, by Daniel Politi, September 23, 2018]



“And from the National Review:



‘…Special cases such as refugees aside, there is no reason whatsoever for the U.S. to welcome immigrants who cannot support themselves without taxpayer subsidies. Current policy does a horrible job of implementing this principle, and therefore we endorse the Trump administration’s new effort to tighten the policy up...

‘Our laws say that immigrants are ineligible for visas and green cards if they are likely to become dependent on the safety net funded by U.S. taxpayers. It’s time to start enforcing that policy.’



[Immigrants should support themselves, by The Editors, National Review, September 24 2018]’



“… Daniel Horowitz at Conservative Review forcefully argued last month that even the idea of immigrants receiving welfare would have been horrifying to the Founding Fathers. 



‘Immigration is an elective policy of a sovereign nation. It should benefit America and never create a public charge. That notion is one of the most foundational principles of our country. It dates back to colonial times and has been enforced by the states since the founding and then by the federal government when it fully reclaimed immigration in the 1880s. That immigrants shouldn’t be a public charge is still the law on the books, yet it’s rarely enforced. Now that the Trump administration is seeking to enforce the law, suddenly the Left is screaming about denying immigrants their rightful citizenship...



‘It’s quite entertaining to watch the open-borders crowd go from explaining how these are the most prosperous immigrants of all time to telling us that the proposal would dramatically cut immigration. Obviously, this is an admission that for decades they have been lying to us about the nature of many of the immigrants coming to the country and just how many of them receive welfare….’



[Welfare for immigrants is alien to our laws, history, and traditions, August 8, 2018]”



“After 1000 ‘Immigrants Don’t Use Welfare’ Stories, MSM Outraged At Trump Restricting Immigrant Welfare Us”, James Kirkpatrick, via vdare.com, September 24, 2018



In sum, focusing on the NET Costs of LEGAL Immigration creates Considerable Additional Leverage to get lower LEGAL Immigration Numbers.



Immigration and especially The NET Costs of Legal Immigration has thus rocketed up to the top issue on the minds of many voters this cycle. So, publicizing the Study is a Key winning message Immigration Reductionists can disseminate for the next few weeks to aid in stopping the fleecing of America. SO CONTACT YOUR REPRESENTATIVES NOW!



And if you can, please help us, (Carrying Capacity Network) intensify our Activist Mobilization, Media, lobbying and public education efforts by helping to mobilize our many thousands of volunteer activists with a one-time tax-deductible donation. Any donation, no matter how small will be greatly appreciated. And remember that CCN is a Genuine Mass Immigration Reduction Group, so Donations to CCN have far more impact dollar for dollar than Donations to Mass Immigration Management Groups who refuse to support a Zero-Net Moratorium.



To help CCN distribute and publicize the NET Costs of Legal Immigration Study, please donate by Credit Card at Carrying Capacity Network, Inc. or by Check via U.S. mail to

CCN’s Mailing Address
CCN
P.O.BOX 457
San Francisco, CA 94104 


Sincerely,


Carrying Capacity Network 

CarryingCapacity.org

CarryingCapacityNetwork.blogspot.com

Follow CCN on Twitter: @CCNetworkOrg and GAB: @CarryingCapacity



Washington DC Address:
1629 K Street NW | Suite 300 | Washington, DC 20006